im a rather convinced poliamorist. meaning conceptually i believe it to be the superior intimacy form. (one might add relationship anarchy as the ultimate standard - total flexibility)
i saw that kia2 was mostly opposing this? how come ?
my logic is simple. we want whats best for our partners > 0 restrictions
our needs and contexts vary wildly > maximum flexibility
the ultimate does not feel > is not controlled by jealousy and other possesive feels
fyi im asexual > graysexual .. rarely feel sexual attraction and i only have 1 partner. but have been studying this for a 7-10 years.
I know where it comes from. It wasn't even KIA, it was especially one mod.
I just don't get why one would want to bring it up. There's only two possible outcomes of bringing it up and either is completely meaningless to the sub and what it stands for.
The only time polyamory is relevant here is when some cucked dev who was in an open relationship with some journo-chick that fucked her editor on the side gets metooed or some other shit like that, and even then the polyamory isn't really the topic
I mean what shall we do with this?
Congratulate him for the courage to tell us something nobody wanted to know?