im a rather convinced poliamorist. meaning conceptually i believe it to be the superior intimacy form. (one might add relationship anarchy as the ultimate standard - total flexibility)
i saw that kia2 was mostly opposing this? how come ?
my logic is simple. we want whats best for our partners > 0 restrictions
our needs and contexts vary wildly > maximum flexibility
the ultimate does not feel > is not controlled by jealousy and other possesive feels
fyi im asexual > graysexual .. rarely feel sexual attraction and i only have 1 partner. but have been studying this for a 7-10 years.
You're cuckolds in denial.
Polyamory/open relationships only favor the woman unless the man is a high value male, in which case she'd never propose it anyway.
Accepting polyamory is admitting to your partner that you are a doormat and have no red lines.
You'd be better off asking TRP.red though, they're the sex guys.
i disagree with everything u stated
You're perfectly within your right to. Just don't try to force me to like it and don't try to convince people it's normal.
Unless you're extending an invitation to us internet strangers to fuck your girl, there's no reason to bring it up.
Tits or GTFO!