The problem with this argument is that it always falls back onto the legal weasel word "obscenity." Which is entirely subjective and varies massively from person to person. The current bill included, cites the obscenity laws within it.
And those are by design meant to be "what would a random person consider not art?" Except oops, a Piss Christ or abortion "exhibit" wouldn't be considered art by normal people but that's given exceptions because The Degenerate Elites like it and not the things those filthy nerds enjoy.
So at the end of the day, the law always just becomes "I think its gross, and think you are gross for liking it." They act like they have some moral highground, but they cannot actually defend their position without falling back on the line that was already a cliche meme back then:
The problem with this argument is that it always falls back onto the legal weasel word "obscenity." Which is entirely subjective and varies massively from person to person. The current bill included, cites the obscenity laws within it.
And those are by design meant to be "what would a random person consider not art?" Except oops, a Piss Christ or abortion "exhibit" wouldn't be considered art by normal people but that's given exceptions because The Degenerate Elites like it and not the things those filthy nerds enjoy.
So at the end of the day, the law always just becomes "I think its gross, and think you are gross for liking it." They act like they have some moral highground, but they cannot actually defend their position without falling back on the line that was already a cliche meme back then:
Or people could just stop making and sharing pornos of small children.
Literally no-one outside of the satanic elite is doing that anymore.