I would say that America promoting the demoralization of foreign people in their native lands is itself an act of war. I don't see the difference between dropping chemical weapons on civilian populations or bombarding them with degenerate ideas that destroy their lives, their families, and their cultures in order to derail their politics and economies.
They're both weapons that destroy civilizations. Honestly, we're in the middle of WW3 right now and don't ever realize it. It's a war fought not with weapons that destroy the flesh but ideas that destroy minds and, in turn, decimate cultures and economies. It's a cynical war where populations are attacked under the guise of "human rights" and "cultural exchange." We're in the middle of it right now.
I don't see the difference between dropping chemical weapons on civilian populations or bombarding them with degenerate ideas that destroy their lives, their families, and their cultures in order to derail their politics and economies.
The only difference is that the first one is faster and more obvious.
at this point, i think other countries are fully in their rights to declare war on America for this shit.
I would say that America promoting the demoralization of foreign people in their native lands is itself an act of war. I don't see the difference between dropping chemical weapons on civilian populations or bombarding them with degenerate ideas that destroy their lives, their families, and their cultures in order to derail their politics and economies.
They're both weapons that destroy civilizations. Honestly, we're in the middle of WW3 right now and don't ever realize it. It's a war fought not with weapons that destroy the flesh but ideas that destroy minds and, in turn, decimate cultures and economies. It's a cynical war where populations are attacked under the guise of "human rights" and "cultural exchange." We're in the middle of it right now.
The only difference is that the first one is faster and more obvious.
And less destructive