The left has advanced an overt war on white civilization through the media, universities, and other mediums. Their primary attack is the reshaping of reality through words. "Islamophobic sex crimes propaganda fuels the far right," or "Grooming and our ignoble tradition of racializing crime," or "UK's racist dog whistle politics vilifies British Pakistani Muslims." In all cases the methodology is the same: take a legitimate cause and shackle it to -isms and -phobias that they have programmed us to recoil from.

Some normal people are naturally compelled to oppose the left, but the critical question is how. In the Gamergate era, the anti-left took a "no, but" strategy that denied association to ism-phobias first, to ward off any disreputable politics from sticking to legitimate causes. "No, I'm not sexist. I just think that some ultra-feminist game devs have a twisted view of male/female relations that's producing terrible games."

This strategy is self-defeating because as everyone can subconsciously sense, it concedes part of the opponent's point while trying to argue against it. People with functioning eyes perceive that the ultra-feminist game devs are mostly women, whether they admit it or not. Therefore, to oppose them is to drive women out of the gaming industry. Targeting women, either inadvertently or purposefully, is sexist. To hedge around this obvious logical chain with "some not all" boilerplate or sops to "true equality" or shrines to Jade Raymond appears deceitful and weak, or even worse, shows self-deception: a person who is so delusional that they can't face the consequences of their actions.

As the anti-left has hardened into the online right, more people adopt the "yes, and" response every year, which acknowledges the implications of their position and says, "so what? It's the truth." In the Gamergate issue this would be, "yes, most of these women should leave gaming. It's better off without them. The greatest era of gaming was created by white nerds in baggy shirts." Internal consistency, courage, and accuracy are the power of a real movement.

Many people on the online right see Trump and the American populist movement as belonging to "no, but." He's actually more in the "yes, and" camp. Beyond all his paeans to this and that celebrity or demographic, he is threatening to the left because the character of his movement is a revival of American self-interest, and his strongest base is a revival of white self-interest. The medium is the message. Anyone watching a Trump rally can see it. White conservatives aren't standing there glumly taking their medicine from Mitt Romney, they're celebrating their power, culture, and future. That's why MAGA has spawned countless alt-right spinoffs. Whether or not Trump cucks out on H-1Bs, he has awakened the American consciousness.

Now Britain is at the crossroads, with reports that over a million white British schoolgirls may have been raped by Pakistanis. This is now open reality: the whole country has been raped. Will this be the start of a sea change in the British public where the answers become, "yes, I dislike Muslims, and for good reason," or "yes, there are too many brown immigrants in Britain, and they should go home"? Hopefully it will, because the survival of the nation hangs on that question.