There's a lot of politics involved in Rust's community which tends to attract the left. Demanding diversity and the removal of white, straight men from their organisation and conferences. There's also an informal war between Rust and C++ where the former would like to replace the latter. You can imagine how that is going down with Linux maintainers who staunchly use C++.
Linux is staunchly C, not C++, but the point still applies.
Personally, I wonder if Rust will have any relevance in 2 decades. C, Zig, or a cleaner C++ like for low level systems programming (with better tools to write memory safe code), and a automatic memory managed language with good enough performance for newer hardware. If Rust were such a developer improvement over c++, why hasn't a Rust game engine displaced Unity and Godot?
There's a lot of politics involved in Rust's community which tends to attract the left. Demanding diversity and the removal of white, straight men from their organisation and conferences. There's also an informal war between Rust and C++ where the former would like to replace the latter. You can imagine how that is going down with Linux maintainers who staunchly use C++.
And this exists: https://www.rust-lang.org/policies/code-of-conduct
Which feeds from this: https://github.com/stumpsyn/policies/blob/master/citizen_code_of_conduct.md
Which really could be described as "check your thinking".
Linux is staunchly C, not C++, but the point still applies.
Personally, I wonder if Rust will have any relevance in 2 decades. C, Zig, or a cleaner C++ like for low level systems programming (with better tools to write memory safe code), and a automatic memory managed language with good enough performance for newer hardware. If Rust were such a developer improvement over c++, why hasn't a Rust game engine displaced Unity and Godot?