"No freedom of reach" and "no freedom from consequences" are constructive restrictions of freedom of speech.
If the reach of your speech is restricted because of its content, and that content is mere opinion, expression, or creativity, then your freedom of speech is being inhibited.
If you face extra "consequences" following your speech because of its content, and that content is mere opinion, expression, or creativity, then your freedom of speech is being inhibited.
The reach/consequences "arguments" are coming from disgusting little scumfucks trying to curtail your rights because they don't like what you have to say, and I guess Elon is just another one of them.
"No freedom of reach" and "no freedom from consequences" are constructive restrictions of freedom of speech.
If the reach of your speech is restricted because of its content, and that content is mere opinion, expression, or creativity, then your freedom of speech is being inhibited.
If you face extra "consequences" following your speech because of its content, and that content is mere opinion, expression, or creativity, then your freedom of speech is being inhibited.
The reach/consequences "arguments" are coming from disgusting little scumfucks trying to curtail your rights because they don't like what you have to say, and I guess Elon is just another one of them.