Translation: He's ass mad about the Starmer Government making fantastic progress in an energy transition that he and Trump will never be able to overturn. Get fucked.
"We've killed the energy infrastructure for the UK permanently! The whole of Britain will be powered by solar farms with cloudy skies and an a density of wind farms greater in density than the number of Pakistani child rapists in Rotherham! CRY HARDER REPUBLITURDS"
Britain must be liberated from these savages by any means available to us.
Britain has no value to the US. They are the dead. I would not send a valuable american life to save the cuckistanians - only to confiscate their nuclear devices to deny the inevitable islamic state nuclear weaponry.
It's not our ground to cede, the brits were our enemy for longer than they've been an "ally " (parasite) and our government would never actually win that war, only waste lives pointlessly like the last 20 years.
Destroying the jihadis is a different conversation than saving the brits, too. If we were actually going to do it, the former is good policy. The latter is a waste of time. We don't want them as a state and allowing them self governance leads to their current problems. The britfags sending agents to meddle in our elections recently also marks them as hostile.
"We've killed the energy infrastructure for the UK permanently! The whole of Britain will be powered by solar farms with cloudy skies and an a density of wind farms greater in density than the number of Pakistani child rapists in Rotherham! CRY HARDER REPUBLITURDS"
Britain must be liberated from these savages by any means available to us.
Britain has no value to the US. They are the dead. I would not send a valuable american life to save the cuckistanians - only to confiscate their nuclear devices to deny the inevitable islamic state nuclear weaponry.
I reject this out-right, and I will not cede ground to the Mohammedians, when we didn't cede Spain either (and that took 400 years).
It's not our ground to cede, the brits were our enemy for longer than they've been an "ally " (parasite) and our government would never actually win that war, only waste lives pointlessly like the last 20 years.
Destroying the jihadis is a different conversation than saving the brits, too. If we were actually going to do it, the former is good policy. The latter is a waste of time. We don't want them as a state and allowing them self governance leads to their current problems. The britfags sending agents to meddle in our elections recently also marks them as hostile.
Britain was only an "enemy" for a few decades. The Special Relationship has been going on for 130 years or so.
I don't think there is a difference between destroying Jihadism and saving Britain.
And yes, the Labour Party is the enemy, obviously. But not all random British people.
Who's this "we" business? You're suddenly taking the White collectivist position?
What? No.
I'm talking about the West generally.
You're a race communist. I don't even consider you part of the West.