Maybe I'm mistaken about the definition of "review bombing" but this doesn't seem like it to me. Negative reviews for an update that bricks your game seem perfectly reasonable to me
Negative reviews for an update that bricks your game seem perfectly reasonable to me
Except in this case it wasn't anyone involved in the game that did the update. I don't think it's fair to punish devs (even Ubisoft) for Microsoft shitting the bed again.
It sucks people can't play the game, but they should wait patiently, or "review bomb" Microsoft somehow. Sounds like Ubisoft is trying to fix the issue, and isn't the (primary) party at fault in this instance.
Leaving negative reviews for a game that worked up until someone else did something doesn't seem fair.
EDIT: I didn't realize it had been months. I thought about putting a 'sunset clause' style disclaimer in my original statement, and should have. Past a certain point - and months qualify - it is back on the devs' heads. So, yeah, fuck Ubisoft.
Maybe I'm mistaken about the definition of "review bombing" but this doesn't seem like it to me. Negative reviews for an update that bricks your game seem perfectly reasonable to me
Except in this case it wasn't anyone involved in the game that did the update. I don't think it's fair to punish devs (even Ubisoft) for Microsoft shitting the bed again.
It sucks people can't play the game, but they should wait patiently, or "review bomb" Microsoft somehow. Sounds like Ubisoft is trying to fix the issue, and isn't the (primary) party at fault in this instance.
Leaving negative reviews for a game that worked up until someone else did something doesn't seem fair.
EDIT: I didn't realize it had been months. I thought about putting a 'sunset clause' style disclaimer in my original statement, and should have. Past a certain point - and months qualify - it is back on the devs' heads. So, yeah, fuck Ubisoft.
I see your point. But if I'm the customer and only have the one option to leave a comment, I'm commenting there.