News reports say free games each day until next Thursday.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (22)
sorted by:
Forced exclusivity isn't functional exclusivity and the fact that you cannot understand the difference between the two shows how retarded the average EGS fanboy is.
That and apparently failing at properly Copy/Pasting.
The problem is first of all it doesn't matter and you don't know what deals were done behind the scenes anyway. If people want to whine about the Chinese involvement that's a different story but complaining they had to buy it at a different place comes across as petty.
If you think people are EGS fanboys for pointing this out then that's retarded.
It absolutely does, and saying it doesn't is why you are being called a fanboy retard. One demands you only cater to them, the other provides a service that is good enough that companies choose not to use anyone else. Its a very easy difference.
Except we know a lot of them because many devs had to explain why their games were suddenly not for sale on Steam after taking money for pre-orders there. Just because you didn't pay attention doesn't mean everyone else didn't.
DARQ was a famous example of a completely independent dev explaining in detail what they tried to pull on him.
Funny how this strawman only comes up for EGS, and never about GOG a completely different storefront that exists completely out of the Steam ecosystem and offers a competitive product without anti-consumer practices.
But since your defense is predicated on everyone being as ignorant as you are, I'd not be shocked if you didn't even know GOG was a thing.
It doesn't. In both cases these companies offered game devs an option and they took it whether it was good for customers or not.
Saying that makes you look silly considering the other comments in this thread.
Except they didn't. Steam didn't ask anything of them that said they could not sell the game elsewhere, as shown by the fact that they exist elsewhere.
Devs choosing themselves to not bother releasing on something else is a decision they make to their own detriment. Epic demanding they not release elsewhere is Epic making the decision for them to the detriment of both the devs and consumers.
But we both know such nuance is lost on you. Its why you can't even respond to the DARQ example, because it completely dismantles that argument.