The author in the screen shot uses words like ,"seems to come up more often", and then wonders why they have legal woes. IF there is an issue, which I am not convinced, they didn't do a very good job selling it. Due to their half ass language, they left themselves open to this legality they're unhappy about.
The complaint is that Screen Rant is using the method of using a whole lot of articles to be seen. But, that only makes sense. There is a whole lot of media out there. Most of us don't give a damn about most of the media out there. They have to cover the bases. What a stupid complaint.
I read what is posted. My takeaway is the author doesn't like the method of mass producing articles to hit SEO. I don't see that as an issue, do you?
Edit: I'd like to point out the articles are written in am intentional, click HERE for this bit of info, them in that article clicked HERE for this hot of info format.
Link is Fandom Pulse's coverage of Valnet threatening a an (actual) journalist who's dug into their (paid?) promotion within Google's algorithm.
In other news, clown world remains fake and gay.
The author in the screen shot uses words like ,"seems to come up more often", and then wonders why they have legal woes. IF there is an issue, which I am not convinced, they didn't do a very good job selling it. Due to their half ass language, they left themselves open to this legality they're unhappy about.
The complaint is that Screen Rant is using the method of using a whole lot of articles to be seen. But, that only makes sense. There is a whole lot of media out there. Most of us don't give a damn about most of the media out there. They have to cover the bases. What a stupid complaint.
Wait, isn't the complaint that Valnet (and possibly other companies) are paying Google for visibility on their search engine?
I read what is posted. My takeaway is the author doesn't like the method of mass producing articles to hit SEO. I don't see that as an issue, do you?
Edit: I'd like to point out the articles are written in am intentional, click HERE for this bit of info, them in that article clicked HERE for this hot of info format.
It was written to confuse intentionally
Not nearly as big an issue as paying for search engine visibility which was my take away.