The author in the screen shot uses words like ,"seems to come up more often", and then wonders why they have legal woes. IF there is an issue, which I am not convinced, they didn't do a very good job selling it. Due to their half ass language, they left themselves open to this legality they're unhappy about.
The complaint is that Screen Rant is using the method of using a whole lot of articles to be seen. But, that only makes sense. There is a whole lot of media out there. Most of us don't give a damn about most of the media out there. They have to cover the bases. What a stupid complaint.
I read what is posted. My takeaway is the author doesn't like the method of mass producing articles to hit SEO. I don't see that as an issue, do you?
Edit: I'd like to point out the articles are written in am intentional, click HERE for this bit of info, them in that article clicked HERE for this hot of info format.
I edited my previous comment to point out that the author chose to put all the information in different places. Screen Rant isn't paying. His complaint about screen rant is they're producing so many articles to hit SEO he as a solo can't compete. That's not paying for screen time. Above I called it hitting all the topics because someone cares about something, and there's so much media.
If you reread the article, notice how short it is? Because all the information requires you to click to read another article. Doesn't that mean this author is also manipulating SEO while complaining about it? I had to read 4 articles to understand his complaint, and declined a pdf download.
The author in the screen shot uses words like ,"seems to come up more often", and then wonders why they have legal woes. IF there is an issue, which I am not convinced, they didn't do a very good job selling it. Due to their half ass language, they left themselves open to this legality they're unhappy about.
The complaint is that Screen Rant is using the method of using a whole lot of articles to be seen. But, that only makes sense. There is a whole lot of media out there. Most of us don't give a damn about most of the media out there. They have to cover the bases. What a stupid complaint.
Wait, isn't the complaint that Valnet (and possibly other companies) are paying Google for visibility on their search engine?
I read what is posted. My takeaway is the author doesn't like the method of mass producing articles to hit SEO. I don't see that as an issue, do you?
Edit: I'd like to point out the articles are written in am intentional, click HERE for this bit of info, them in that article clicked HERE for this hot of info format.
It was written to confuse intentionally
Not nearly as big an issue as paying for search engine visibility which was my take away.
I edited my previous comment to point out that the author chose to put all the information in different places. Screen Rant isn't paying. His complaint about screen rant is they're producing so many articles to hit SEO he as a solo can't compete. That's not paying for screen time. Above I called it hitting all the topics because someone cares about something, and there's so much media.
If you reread the article, notice how short it is? Because all the information requires you to click to read another article. Doesn't that mean this author is also manipulating SEO while complaining about it? I had to read 4 articles to understand his complaint, and declined a pdf download.