I'm curious what people here think. I'm sure everyone here has seen the salt about Joe Rogan and how Kamala should have gone on his podcast (her team kept her off so she wouldn't show off how retarded she is to even more people) or how the left needs its "own Joe Rogan" (not possible because they would cancel it the minute it deviated from leftist orthodoxy). A lot of that is the left blaming everyone but themselves like they do every time they lose an election, but I kind of wonder if there's something to the theory. I don't listen to Rogan, but my understanding of his podcast is that politics isn't really the main focus and his listening base contains a lot of largely apolitical young men who are drawn it him because he talks about things they're interested in and doesn't shit on them like the legacy media does. If I'm a Joe Rogan listener who's not plugged into political stuff and I see Trump do a 3 hour interview for the podcast and see Kamala make excuses not to do the same, that's gonna leave me with a favorable impression towards Trump and make me more likely to vote for him. Since Rogan has 50 million listeners even a tiny percentage of them being moved from Kamala to Trump or not voting to Trump could move the needle.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (26)
sorted by:
What really decided the election is how tired everyone is of the woketard moral terrorism schtick.
This is why they will never have their own "Joe Rogan" because they are incapable of having a rational discussion with anyone not perfectly in lockstep with the current woke morality bat signal.
Any disagreement is heresy, and heretics are ostracized, always.
These moral terrorists will eventually have to be seen as the evil people they are before anyone on the Democrat side of the isle will be capable of building a coalition with those to the right of them. Progressive moral dominance ideology has total control.