He attempted to look fair and balanced to neutrals, but anyone who saw the debates he held between pro-GG and aGGro knew what the score was.
Just the fact that he was willing to platform both sides (even when he is comically biased in favor of the anti-GG side) made him appear to look neutral to some though, since most of the time we didn't even get that much acknowledgement in most places.
Iirc wasn't he one of those psychos? I definitely don't remember his name in any good context lmao
Ah, a Pakman type then? Guess that makes sense
Pakman was never "fair and balanced." He's a leftist true believer. There is no "fair" way to cover disagreement with the One True Ideology.
He attempted to look fair and balanced to neutrals, but anyone who saw the debates he held between pro-GG and aGGro knew what the score was.
Just the fact that he was willing to platform both sides (even when he is comically biased in favor of the anti-GG side) made him appear to look neutral to some though, since most of the time we didn't even get that much acknowledgement in most places.