I bought it but got a refund. I was a huge fan of the first game and enjoyed CoP well enough, though it felt like a completely different game that only shared aesthetics with the SoC.
I think I played for about an hour and in that time it felt like I was being led by the nose through the "quests". I don't know if the world opened up after that a linear "curated" experience isn't what draws me to that game. The first anomaly you went through had an obvious path so you didn't have to throw bolts, (I'm not sure that was even in the game unless I just missed it).
I'm a tard who plays PC games with a controller and there didn't appear to be aim assist which I know is lame but is also standard at this point when you use a controller in FPS (or it is there and I just suck terribly). Also the inventory interface was rough with the controller with some seriously counter-intuitive control scheme decisions.
The game was pretty enough and ran fine but just felt kind of cheaply slapped together compared to the obviously lovingly crafted first one.
And really minor complaint that there was no Russian voice available. I know there us Ukranian voice and its close enough to Russian that it doesn't matter for atmosphere, but it feels unnecessarily petty considering you know everyone who worked on the game probably spoke both.
I watched a friend stream it (my PC can't run it lol) and what really bothered me is how they fucked with the story.
In the prologue they establish that the anomalous artifacts found in the zone lose their anomalous energy if taken outside the zone, and that basically means that stalkers shouldn't exist, period.
The entire reason that stalkers exist is because of the artifacts, people try to sneak past the military cordon to get into the zone to retrieve the artifacts to sell to the outside because the artifacts have all kinds of extremely useful properties. Just think of how useful an item that purges radiation from the body or heals wounds rapidly might be.
If artifacts become useless outside the zone then they would have rapidly depreciating value and there would be very few stalkers going into the zone outside of government, scientific and military stalkers. It undermines the entire setting on a fundamental level.
And to make things even more absurd, Stalker 2 establishes that scientists were trying to figure out how to recharge artifacts and the project got canned due to safety reasons, despite the massive benefits of such a project.
The game opens up after you get through the prologue, the presentation is great and I could accept the game's flaws and lack of A-Life (devs said it isn't working yet) but I can't forgive the bad writing and worldbuilding.
It's pretty clear that the game was made by a different team with different ideas and their ideas are not better than their predecessors.
Why do they always have to fundamentally ruin a story with a sequel? I don't understand it. There are so many ways to tell a new story without changing the one that came before.
Modern writers don't seem to be able to really look at the big picture and understand why things are the way they are. They have to retcon story and worldbuilding aspects to insert their own ideas even if it ruins what came before.
The worst part is that none of this was even necessary. The writers wanted protagonist man to get a special artifact outside the Zone and go into it to uncover its mysteries (which is pretty much what happens in the current story) and they could have kept this story with some minor alterations to avoid damaging the worldbuilding.