Speaking of the paradox of tolerance, here's a pretentious analysis of Dirty Harry I came across in the wild
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (34)
sorted by:
I don't think the reviewer is pretentious. The reviewer nails Dirty Harry exactly as the movie was meant. Nice, gentle liberals can't handle psychopaths like Scorpio.
And that is a chilling thought. Because it means humanity can't rise from its barbarity or cruelty.
Justified force isn't barbaric, Scorpio-lover. Harry is only "Dirty" in the context of communist-infiltrated Hollywood.
They call him Dirty Harry because the cops make him do all the unpleasant jobs, not because he's a corrupt cop. They literally spell it out in the first movie when he talks the guy out of suicide.
I was critiquing the idea that we should be morally uncertain of Callahan instead of unmitigated supporters by using the idea of a dirty cop which is the only way this uncertainty can be claimed.