The post is explicitly invoking the stereotype that it is the inherent trait of jews that they will always claim to be victims while attacking others.

Yeah, because that's exactly what happened here; Jews did attack others, then claim to be victims.

He insinuates that this incident is an extension of that with the Twitter post alleging that there is a jewish media campaign to protect jewish violence. That that hooliganism is the attack, where the jews will claim they are the victims.

Again, that's what seemed to be happening.

And you're the one saying 'inherent.'

See, I just stated all those things openly, that some Jews did exactly that. That's not against the rules. I'm not saying all Jews. Neither was btbw; you chose to read it that way.

...under no circumstance should intent or context be considered relevant to any enforcement action...

Not exactly, but rules/laws do need clear and equal enforcement. If you're always trying to glean intent, that's naturally going to bias you. There are people you don't like; they'll get banned, while people saying the exact same things won't. Exact thing happened in this instance. btbw's comment was essentially a mirror of the one right before that, on which no action was taken. You go out of your way to ban btbw and others.

You will continue to berate and insult me because you do not believe that moderation should ever consider intent and context.

Up until rather recently, I've been nothing but polite to you; I just disagreed with you. I've disagreed with you from the very, very start, because our rules are retarded and no one wants them. I've always been polite. And I started this post off polite as well.

You've said I'm your enemy, and that I essentially want you dead. You've said others here want you did in much more explicit terms.

You just always want to turn it into you being the victim, when the vast majority of people disagree with you, and tell you as such.

I see it as completely irrational and intentionally building holes into rules so that they effectively cease to exist.

Whereas you do the exact opposite; your haphazard enforcement of the rules is barely distinguishable from just banning whoever you want. People you don't like have worse "intent" and thus get ridiculous year long bans for posting basic comments or posts.

My "letter of the law" approach would work infinitely better than your "feels" approach.