Leather Apron Club, who makes great videos, released his election day message recently: if you're a conservative, don't vote. Basically it's a takedown of various boomer talking points for voting (civic duty, lesser of two evils, can't complain if you didn't vote, etc).
The problem is, the boomer talking points are not the reality of voting. The vote is an exercise of power that, while virtually meaningless on an individual level, advances group consensus.
"Voting for a candidate endorses 100% of their platform."
- This is simply wrong and frankly a naive statement. No need to elaborate on this, just look up Bush's term after he thought he won a "mandate" with his 2004 reelection.
"Voters are dumb cows who don't even know who's in power or how it's exercised."
- Largely true. Problem is, you will need a majority of those cows on your side to effect any meaningful political change. Voting for a cause orients them in a general direction.
"The Republican party keeps getting more liberal"
- While this is true on paper, if the only paper you read is campaign press releases, anyone paying the slightest attention to the Overton window since Trump became a national figure should be able to perceive that the right is actually moving farther right. The true liberal "softening" of the GOP was in the 2000s and early 2010s.
"Trump backed off on abortion"
- Trump gave you the repeal of Roe v. Wade, something I thought was unlikely in my lifetime. Any counterpoint to this is disingenuous.
"Trump supports Israel and he's in bed with the neocons"
- The only way to end the current wars is to make peace with the respective stronger party in each: Russia and Israel. Any suggestion that Trump has gone neocon is risible.
"Reading a book or volunteering or getting a government job is a better political action than voting"
- No. Beyond the stated purpose, voting is a measure of allegiance to a particular direction. It's arguably one of the most tenuous, but it galvanizes half the country into conflict with the deep state. Without conflict, there is no movement. Without awareness, nothing is possible.
People are designed to move in groups. Groups create change. Reading a book or whatever is predicated on the idea that intellectual power will be the primary lever at some point down the line, which approaches utopian thinking.
Vote. Use the tool at hand to take action.
Maybe it varies from state to state, but if one can't even be assed to vote for propositions/amendments and parody/protest candidates, they're part of the problem. Exceptions to those who attempted more active resistance. For the most recent 3 elections, any objections to Trump are outweighed by what is permitted when he loses; the status quo that has persisted since the progressive era. Another Trump win increases the possibility that your preferred social structure is achieved in your lifetime, or your great grandkids'. After a Trump victory, we might have the opportunity to tell the McCain/Romney voting base to suck a long one.
From what I can tell, LAC is a follower of Nick Fuentes. That doesn't discount his coverage of historical analysis, but they're (groypers and other personality centric groups) are driven by drama and related herd social noise, then drawing their conclusions to satisfy in-group approval. For LAC's emphasis of being outside the mainstream, he comes off as a single-issue citizen. Maybe he has real hot takes in videos I haven't seen.