Unironically, Trump is going to lose
(archive.is)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (25)
sorted by:
Violence is a leftist quality fren. We must turn the other cheek and pray. God always wins! /s
You idiot. People don't make that argument for moral reasons, but for reasons of effectiveness. And that is why glowie retards like you try to persuade people to be violent, so that they can be arrested and your handlers have even more of an excuse to crack down on Trump supporters.
Speaking purely hypothetically, violence only works when there is a critical mass of people. You declaring a revolution from your back yard is going to do... precisely nothing.
You don't get a critical mass of people if everyone is scared of using violence. That's why many people encourage violence before the critical mass to try to get a critical mass. No one suggests standing on a hill by themselves but you're never going to get a hill full of people of not one person is willing to stand on the hill. Though, to be fair, you only get a critical mass of people when there's no food, water and electricity. Or if the government is involved.
Yes, you do, dummy. Because a glowie retard federal agent like you will bait someone into using violence. There will be a giant crackdown on him and everyone else who supports Trump. Then people will be even more scared than before. In the aftermath of Jan 6, Trump supporters were saying not even to protest because it is a trap. Now that is real fear.
Feds are not people.
Purely hypothetically, in a parallel universe where the place I live was actually oppressive rather than free, democratic and all that, I would be willing to stand on a hill. What I would not be willing to do in that case, is lose everything with zero chance of improvement, and 100% chance of deterioration.
I'm not sure, but probably true.
Oh, so we're good.
I'm just saying historically whenever there's a violent revolution there's usually rich people from the government involved. That's usually because they'll have the resources to be able to make a real stand on a hill and then people will follow along with being able to promote enough propaganda to get significant support.
The peasant classes rarely if ever have risen up entirely on their own unless it was a matter of life or death.
But also, it's rare for radical changes to occur in government without the use of force. The use of force doesn't necessarily need to mean significant violence but the threat of it can be enough as well like when militaries execute coups, they can often be minimal in the amount of violence used.