A redirect might be appropriate but I think much of the text might be skirting ethical issues so it should be deleted first so it doesn't appear in the history.
The only possibly appropriate content is already covered in the MrBeast article, though I'm not convinced that even that is justified.
already covered and the article history has too many BLP vios to justify preserving . Can be recreated as a redirect afterwards (ideally with EC protection to prevent this from being re-created again)
As a reminder of what the allegations were about: https://archive.ph/dr8aT#selection-1949.0-1949.11
Wikipedia just deleted the article, of course. Here are some of the arguments the weasels there made to justify the decision: