Your understanding of English is like a 2nd grader telling a math professor that you can only subtract the smaller number from the larger number.
What you have written isn't a title, it is a description. It is as painful to read for a native speaker as rubbing one's face on a cheese grater. It is like listening to someone with a stutter. It destroys it's informational content even as it attempts to deliver the information.
The title is the reader’s first impression and, like the introduction, fits the subject and tone of the paper. Sometimes the title announces the subject simply and directly: “Grant and Lee” or “Civil Disobedience.” Often a title uses alliteration to reflect the writer’s humorous approach, as in “A Pepsi Person in the Perrier Generation,” or a twisted cliché, as in “The Right Wrong Stuff.” A good title may also arouse the reader's curiosity by asking a question, as does “Who Killed the Bog Men of Denmark? And Why?”
A good way to begin developing a title is to try condensing your thesis statement without becoming too vague or general.
Reread your introduction and conclusion, and examine key words and phrases for possible titles. Try to work in some indication of what your attitude and approach are.
So, when I put a description in a title box, that is in no way a title? Oh. O.K. How about you use your big brain to write a proper title for me? Amaze me!
How about, "Charlie Kirk Refutes Dipshit Troon," which is an actual title and not a blog post containing your commentary, which isn't what a title is. Other threads use the same commentary style approach you did, but when they do they don't capitalize every word. They do this because they're native english speakers and understand a paragraph of declarative sentences isn't capitalized. Please go back to tending your rickshaw.
Let me help you by being maximally charitable, Ranjeet, because I know you are not Brahmin caste and therefore lack knowledge of western practices such as composition and waste treatment.
I exclusively view this forum on mobile and as such had no idea the person in the thumbnail was Charlie Kirk, so I rely on titles to understand what the fuck the thread is about in the first place. My eyesight isn't amazing and the image size on my phone is rather small. So when I see that the first full sentence of your ESL title is "His Statement That Each State Should Have an Allotment of Autonomy Is Note Worthy." I neither know who "His" refers to, or what "allotment of autonomy" means at all out of context. I also wonder why "noteworthy" is misspelled, but the stench of curry clears that up for me. All this is what we in the west would refer to as bad practice, because instead of giving the reader (who has no idea what the thread is about) proper context, you just shit out opinions onto the forum like a C. Diff patient in Mumbai. This is what the post form proper is for, not the title, because your feeble shudras caste opinions, while charmingly simple, are not appropriate when the person reading your 10-day Duolingo demo introduction have no fucking idea what you're talking about in the first place.
The next two sentences of your title are not even proper English and quite literally read like machine-translations, showing us all that you should have been spending more time redeeming in your classes, saar.
Your understanding of English is like a 2nd grader telling a math professor that you can only subtract the smaller number from the larger number.
What you have written isn't a title, it is a description. It is as painful to read for a native speaker as rubbing one's face on a cheese grater. It is like listening to someone with a stutter. It destroys it's informational content even as it attempts to deliver the information.
From the Harbrace College Handbook, 12th, ed. ch. 33f, section 3
Your title fails at being a title.
So, when I put a description in a title box, that is in no way a title? Oh. O.K. How about you use your big brain to write a proper title for me? Amaze me!
How about, "Charlie Kirk Refutes Dipshit Troon," which is an actual title and not a blog post containing your commentary, which isn't what a title is. Other threads use the same commentary style approach you did, but when they do they don't capitalize every word. They do this because they're native english speakers and understand a paragraph of declarative sentences isn't capitalized. Please go back to tending your rickshaw.
How about I write whatever title I want, for my thread, to express my viewpoint, and you sit down?
Let me help you by being maximally charitable, Ranjeet, because I know you are not Brahmin caste and therefore lack knowledge of western practices such as composition and waste treatment.
I exclusively view this forum on mobile and as such had no idea the person in the thumbnail was Charlie Kirk, so I rely on titles to understand what the fuck the thread is about in the first place. My eyesight isn't amazing and the image size on my phone is rather small. So when I see that the first full sentence of your ESL title is "His Statement That Each State Should Have an Allotment of Autonomy Is Note Worthy." I neither know who "His" refers to, or what "allotment of autonomy" means at all out of context. I also wonder why "noteworthy" is misspelled, but the stench of curry clears that up for me. All this is what we in the west would refer to as bad practice, because instead of giving the reader (who has no idea what the thread is about) proper context, you just shit out opinions onto the forum like a C. Diff patient in Mumbai. This is what the post form proper is for, not the title, because your feeble shudras caste opinions, while charmingly simple, are not appropriate when the person reading your 10-day Duolingo demo introduction have no fucking idea what you're talking about in the first place.
The next two sentences of your title are not even proper English and quite literally read like machine-translations, showing us all that you should have been spending more time redeeming in your classes, saar.