Yes, don't vote for the imperfect candidate who still agrees with 80% of your policy goals. Instead vote for the one who disagrees with all of them.
I can't believe did anyone who studies politics doesn't understand that the current two-party system leaves us with a binary: you're never going to get to candidate that you agree with completely, you're only choice is to pick between the two for the one that you dislike the least.
If it was Nikki Haley and Kamala, like the assassination attempt was supposed to put in place, I would probably stay home. You're picking between Hillary and retarded Hillary. At that point it's unknowable which would be less worse, if either.
Yes, don't vote for the imperfect candidate who still agrees with 80% of your policy goals. Instead vote for the one who disagrees with all of them.
I can't believe did anyone who studies politics doesn't understand that the current two-party system leaves us with a binary: you're never going to get to candidate that you agree with completely, you're only choice is to pick between the two for the one that you dislike the least.
If it was Nikki Haley and Kamala, like the assassination attempt was supposed to put in place, I would probably stay home. You're picking between Hillary and retarded Hillary. At that point it's unknowable which would be less worse, if either.
Nikki would be worse
With Nikki you would get the blame for the fuckups and wars, while making all the same decisions.