Yes, don't vote for the imperfect candidate who still agrees with 80% of your policy goals. Instead vote for the one who disagrees with all of them.
I can't believe did anyone who studies politics doesn't understand that the current two-party system leaves us with a binary: you're never going to get to candidate that you agree with completely, you're only choice is to pick between the two for the one that you dislike the least.
you're only choice is to pick between the two for the one that you dislike the least.
No. I have the choice to not participate. I refuse to be bullied into a bad decision. The lesson of the two party system is you should DESTROY it, not take some goofball political lesson from it, then vote against yourself just to say you did.
Yes, don't vote for the imperfect candidate who still agrees with 80% of your policy goals. Instead vote for the one who disagrees with all of them.
I can't believe did anyone who studies politics doesn't understand that the current two-party system leaves us with a binary: you're never going to get to candidate that you agree with completely, you're only choice is to pick between the two for the one that you dislike the least.
No. I have the choice to not participate. I refuse to be bullied into a bad decision. The lesson of the two party system is you should DESTROY it, not take some goofball political lesson from it, then vote against yourself just to say you did.
Fucking goofy.
But if you don't vote for 1 you can't complain!!!!
California nutcase dei hire vs shabbos goy NYC real estate developer...
What a choice.