Which is worse? Eunice Winstead getting married at 9 or Brooke shields getting pimped out by kikes at Hollywood at around 10-12.
Both are terrible, you retard.
And you, hilariously, refuse to engage with me pointing out that the "age of menarche," which you claim to hold so dear, was much, much higher, than what it is today.
You cling to "historical" records, while ignoring that contexts change. We've poisoned the populace, and brought about menstruation earlier.
You want to fuck kids. That was not the norm in the past, however much you claim "kike interference."
Children having menstruation is a new thing. Doesn't mean we should all go out and fuck them.
If you want to fuck kids, there's something very much wrong with you, end of story.
You claim it's "natural" to want to fuck ten year olds. The historical analogue would be wanting to fuck 16-17 year olds. Totally different story.
You're a pedophile and, no, I don't care that you claim only "faggots" can be pedophiles. No; attraction to children is pedophilia. You are (or at least claim to be) attracted to children.
You are a pedophile. And you should R16 and R2. End of story.
Your hero is a nine-year old girl, and you've said you want to fuck ten year olds. Even the most liberal cut off definition of pedophilia currently extends up to 13.
When did I say I want to fuck 10 year old girls. Quote me.
I can't quote you, you keep getting banned for being a piece of shit. Nice try though.
But you've said it multiple times, explicitly.
You've also said "menstruation" is the marker, and that can happen (outside of rare exceptions) as early nine and, with exceptions, much earlier, nowadays.
You've said you're fine with fucking ten year olds, multiple times.
Also Eunice Winstead had her first child at around 14 or 15 not 9.
You don't get pregnant every time. She was married at nine. She was pregnant around thirteen at latest, meaning she was fucked at twelve or thirteen at the absolute latest. That's what you're advocating for.
So, yeah sorry for slandering you (I didn't, you said it), you want to fuck twelve year olds, not ten year olds. My bad. Totally different story.
Both are terrible, you retard.
And you, hilariously, refuse to engage with me pointing out that the "age of menarche," which you claim to hold so dear, was much, much higher, than what it is today.
You cling to "historical" records, while ignoring that contexts change. We've poisoned the populace, and brought about menstruation earlier.
You want to fuck kids. That was not the norm in the past, however much you claim "kike interference."
Children having menstruation is a new thing. Doesn't mean we should all go out and fuck them.
If you want to fuck kids, there's something very much wrong with you, end of story.
You claim it's "natural" to want to fuck ten year olds. The historical analogue would be wanting to fuck 16-17 year olds. Totally different story.
You're a pedophile and, no, I don't care that you claim only "faggots" can be pedophiles. No; attraction to children is pedophilia. You are (or at least claim to be) attracted to children.
You are a pedophile. And you should R16 and R2. End of story.
Your hero is a nine-year old girl, and you've said you want to fuck ten year olds. Even the most liberal cut off definition of pedophilia currently extends up to 13.
Woodchipper.
I can't quote you, you keep getting banned for being a piece of shit. Nice try though.
But you've said it multiple times, explicitly.
You've also said "menstruation" is the marker, and that can happen (outside of rare exceptions) as early nine and, with exceptions, much earlier, nowadays.
You've said you're fine with fucking ten year olds, multiple times.
You don't get pregnant every time. She was married at nine. She was pregnant around thirteen at latest, meaning she was fucked at twelve or thirteen at the absolute latest. That's what you're advocating for.
So, yeah sorry for slandering you (I didn't, you said it), you want to fuck twelve year olds, not ten year olds. My bad. Totally different story.
Fuck off, pedo.