The current Prime Minister appoints someone when there's an opening
The Queen (now King Cuck) rubber stamps it
The person then serves until 75, working for the party that has usually been thrown out of power long ago and able to block the legislation passed by the actual elected House of Commons.
The person turns 75, retires and we go back to 1.
Justin claimed "senate reform" by kicking all the Liberal Senators out of the liberal party but they almost all united together (as have every single new one Justin's appointed) as the "Independent Senators Group" that votes with Justin more often than the Liberal Party senators did.
He also claims the "Independent Advisory Board for Senate Appointment" he created makes the choices but he literally controls that too.
What's the theoretical justification for that convoluted system? I know the UK's House of Lords is a leftover from medieval times and they're only able to delay laws, not block them entirely.
Neither do most Canadians. Here's the gist:
The current Prime Minister appoints someone when there's an opening
The Queen (now King Cuck) rubber stamps it
The person then serves until 75, working for the party that has usually been thrown out of power long ago and able to block the legislation passed by the actual elected House of Commons.
The person turns 75, retires and we go back to 1.
Justin claimed "senate reform" by kicking all the Liberal Senators out of the liberal party but they almost all united together (as have every single new one Justin's appointed) as the "Independent Senators Group" that votes with Justin more often than the Liberal Party senators did.
He also claims the "Independent Advisory Board for Senate Appointment" he created makes the choices but he literally controls that too.
What's the theoretical justification for that convoluted system? I know the UK's House of Lords is a leftover from medieval times and they're only able to delay laws, not block them entirely.