eh, sortof. the more it gets out about what a scam IQ is, the more shit is going to pop off. and no one wants to fix it because any fix will be labeled racist/sexist.
for example, IQ is a relative score vs people your age. and the more you learn "how to think" vs your peers, the more your IQ goes up. this is why, for example, when kids take puberty blockers, it stunts brain development, and the kid "loses" 10+ points of IQ in only a year. it's not that the kid actually lost any points, but that the average around him moved up relative to him. in 2-3 years, it's 20+ points "lost".
meanwhile, more and more studies keep showing that a proper education in critical thinking and spatial geometry measurably increases IQ, sometimes quite significantly. one of the big running examples right now is studying for the LSAT. it's not the only one that does it, but it certainly does.
if there was actually unbiased research going on here, it'd show that every individual has an AQ or aptitude quotient, which is basically the maximum output their brain can possibly achieve under optimal conditions. and AQ is absolutely not equal across races or sexes, not even close. all the social shit, and actually studying, only dictates how much your IQ reaches your AQ. and if you put someone of lower AQ through all the same, they will just cap out. it's why magic dirt theory doesn't work.
even talking about IQ as it is right now is taboo. larry summers, president of harvard years back, was cancelled simply for talking about IQ distributions. there's significantly less variance in female IQ, so even if you conclude men and women average the same, at the ends (120+, 130+, 140+, 80-, 70-, 60-, etc), the men outnumber the women by increasingly larger and larger gaps. by 140 IQ, men outnumber women somewhere between 10:1 to 100:1. this is undisputed data, but he got cancelled for it.
the leftist problem is that they believe no one has higher AQ than anyone else.
eh, sortof. the more it gets out about what a scam IQ is, the more shit is going to pop off. and no one wants to fix it because any fix will be labeled racist/sexist.
for example, IQ is a relative score vs people your age. and the more you learn "how to think" vs your peers, the more your IQ goes up. this is why, for example, when kids take puberty blockers, it stunts brain development, and the kid "loses" 10+ points of IQ in only a year. it's not that the kid actually lost any points, but that the average around him moved up relative to him. in 2-3 years, it's 20+ points "lost".
meanwhile, more and more studies keep showing that a proper education in critical thinking and spatial geometry measurably increases IQ, sometimes quite significantly. one of the big running examples right now is studying for the LSAT. it's not the only one that does it, but it certainly does.
if there was actually unbiased research going on here, it'd show that every individual has an AQ or aptitude quotient, which is basically the maximum output their brain can possibly achieve under optimal conditions. and AQ is absolutely not equal across races or sexes, not even close. all the social shit, and actually studying, only dictates how much your IQ reaches your AQ. and if you put someone of lower AQ through all the same, they will just cap out. it's why magic dirt theory doesn't work.
even talking about IQ as it is right now is taboo. larry summers, president of harvard years back, was cancelled simply for talking about IQ distributions. there's significantly less variance in female IQ, so even if you conclude men and women average the same, at the ends (120+, 130+, 140+, 80-, 70-, 60-, etc), the men outnumber the women by increasingly larger and larger gaps. by 140 IQ, men outnumber women somewhere between 10:1 to 100:1. this is undisputed data, but he got cancelled for it.
the leftist problem is that they believe no one has higher AQ than anyone else.