Go to any of the Canadian Reddit forums for example that allow discussion and man, it's fuck the government, fuck immigrants, who do you think controls everything, etc... it's not what it was like 5 years ago.
Meanwhile on here it's like hello KIA2, I'd like to have a discussion on... Banned. DOM didn't like your haircut.
How can these both be true?
Isn’t the perpetuation of your civilization, where people aren’t forcibly raped, enough of a “gain” for a civilized man? I just don’t see the implicit necessity of linking these two things. I think back to the gentle place, ringed in spears.
Hmm…not sure I’ve ever really come across an ideology of God like that which didn’t ultimately boil down to “do as thou wilt shall be the whole of law”… what separates your view from Crowlyism or more generically satanism?
Humans are good and evil aligned even if God is not. And if we don't use good and evil because everyone wants to be good rather than evil we can say humans essentially have two alignments, A and B.
From the perspective of clown world they are doing everything in their interests. There are no problems. Call them alignment A. I am aligned B. Of course all individuals have a spectrum and aren't wholly A or B. From my perspective, I wouldn't want to promote A if I had the power to promote anything but I have to adapt as a B to an A world. What the hypothetical ideal for me is, will be different than the hypothetical ideal is of any other individual.
I am fine with rape depending on the context. I don't think rape is always bad. I don't even think most instances we may consider to be rape today to be in fact rape. Things aren't so objective to me. Most of what people consider to be civilization is just chains to me.
Out if curiosity, when is legitimate rape ever acceptable?
Also, do you believe raping children is objectively evil?
Well, the idea that women should have autonomy such that they could be raped is not a sound concept for me. An ideal civilization for me would recognize male supremacy such that all women are merely properly of a man or free game for any man. If she has no owner, then she has every right to prevent a man from forcing himself on her but if she can't stop the man, it's not rape. If a man violates a woman who belongs to another man then that's essentially vandalism and punishable but not rape because the woman has no right to consent in an ideal civilization.
When it comes to people of a different group, I don't care what happens to them. I would think it would be decent incentive to conquer foreign lands if one were to allow men to take the women of foreigners and do whatever they want with them. Sounds good to me.
As for raping kids. Personally, I am quite against it. Kids likely belong to their father or guardian and violating them is violating another man's property. Kids in foreign lands of foreign people? I don't care. That's up to the individual in question. Personally, I wouldn't force myself sexually on kids so young but I would take kids for slaves including sex slaves to train for when they're older.
I appreciate you taking the time to explain your views, but you have made the perfect case for why there is nothing more dangerous than an atheist or, apparently, a deist.
That you have no problems with stronger men treating women and children like cattle speaks of a mind so utterly devoid of humanity that I'm left wondering if a man can be born without a soul. You seriously need to address the trauma that left you utterly incapable of empathy. You need to spend some time around good women and children instead of writing them all off because you had some bad experiences.
I'm not trying to be rude, but you're legitimately sick in the head. Your logic is sound from your skewed perspective. But coming to the conclusions you have should have made you realize that the entire premise is wrong from the start. Good and evil do exist. Being able to justify child rape and enslavement is a serious, serious problem. One that you should probably lock yourself up for until you manage to realize how wrong you are.
I'll finish by saying that I do value your consistency and your logical ability. You're obviously an intelligent person. But as much as I've valued logic, I have learned that the heart is important too. I know for a fact you'd never have been able to think this way if you had a child of your own. You'd never be able to stomach the thought of a stronger man killing you and then taking your child as a sex slave. From there you'd eventually learn sympathy for others who have had that happened to them. And then, if you continued to mature emotionally, you'd discover that you could imagine the pain others went through and would want to spare them that pain if it was at all in your power.