I received an email today from my family doctor's clinic telling patients to be less particular about whether they get to see their doctor or not when they schedule an appointment with... their doctor. The parts I take issue with are in bold. Here's the email body:
Good Morning <clinic> Patients,
A Reminder to Our Patients: <clinic> is Proud to Be a Teaching and Team-Based Facility.
Medical learners (students and residents, most of whom are training to be family physicians) are an important part of our team. Physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and locum/covering physicians are also crucial to our clinic functioning.
With the help of our team:
- We are able to offer non-urgent appointments usually within 1-2 weeks.
- We are able to offer same-day appointments for urgent issues.
- We are able to continue to provide care to our current <clinic> patients at a time when there are a record number of family physicians leaving practice.
- We play an important role in training the next generation of family physicians.
There have been an increasing number of patients requesting appointments with their provider only (and declining to see other members of the <clinic> team). This causes significant disruptions to the clinic and affects our ability to provide equitable care to all <clinic> patients.
Moving forward, when you book an appointment, you should expect that you may see a medical learner, physician assistant, nurse practitioner, or a physician covering for your primary family physician. For many appointments, your family physician will be available to see you after you have been seen by another practitioner, if requested or needed. Please be aware that learners and physician assistants are supervised directly by your physician.
This team-based model of care may not be the right one for you, and if you wish to transfer your care to another clinic, we will be happy to waive the usual fee for transfer of records.
We appreciate the important role you play in medical education and making practicing family medicine sustainable.
Sincerely,
The physicians and staff at <clinic>.
So basically, patients want to see their doctors instead of medical students and the clinic is telling the patients to fuck off with their standards and expectations. Instead of building rapport, confidence, and sharing personal vulnerabilities with your family doctor, you can now expect to do it with random, unqualified, inexperienced people who you'll never see again and who don't know your history. If you don't like it, despite paying these fuckers' wages, you can pound sand.
FYI, when this email says the students and assistants are directly supervised, it's figurative. It means the students and assistants report to the doctors, not that the doctors are in the room while the assessments and appointments are conducted. You're expected to meet with these unqualifieds one-on-one. There used to be supervised appointments where medical students would simply shadow the doctor with permission from the patient, but that hasn't been the case for years.
Also, moving to another family doctor is extremely difficult. Most doctors have a maxed-out roster and are not accepting new patients. There are 2.3 million Ontarians without consistent access to a family doctor in a province of 14.5 million.
Canadian tax dollars at work.
Boomers are terrified of death in a way that no previous generation of old people has ever been. Used to be that back in the day you just accepted dying as a fact of life, the moment you fell ill with common old people diseases like cancer or heart disease or kidney failure you just laid down and died. I wonder how many boomers, despite professing religiosity, either don't really believe in an afterlife, or fear that their degeneracy has landed them a spot in hell.
Not to mention that at a certain point, you just don't have quality of life anymore. Euthanasia is a slippery slope, however once you're past, say, 70, I don't think it's unreasonable to say, sorry, all we can offer from this point on is palliative care.
Aging is entropy's effect on the human body, and when you fight entropy, the law of diminishing returns will make costs go up exponentially. Why invest a given sum of cash to give a diapered fossil one extra year of life, when the same investment can give someone younger an extra decade of a much higher quality of life?
Realistically, this (an aging population, in a socialized healthcare system, clinging longer and longer as tech advances) is behind the push for MAID, and realistically most people wouldn’t have a problem if they didn’t hear about depressed teenagers or young people cripple by the vax being offered euthanasia