I just got back from my 16 day ban. I missed the ban thread and wanted to paste my comment to see if anyone cared to respond. Dom has a hard on for me and a few other users because we keep busting his balls for censorship and we like railing against jewish supremacists.
But to my point: Dom isn't that bad. Hes not insane (probably) nor a jidf (probably). And he's actually gone enough so we actually get some free speech discussion. I imagine it's because he has a life and is not a tranny online only redditor.
But his issue is that he's trying to curate this board into his own idea of what we should be instead of what the userbase actually is. We are a bunch of gamers, christians, right wingers, autists and historians, and we all argue about these things, which includes a lot of hot button politics. But thats this community, not some reddit tier safe space. The whole internet is becoming a safe space, we dont need another. I myself migrated here from conpro and kia2 on reddit after the banning of t_d and its way better here having real discussions.
He is trying to direct this community towards what he thinks we should be. The community is the community. A mod coming along and telling us we need to be something else is not his place. He needs to keep illegal shit off the board and beyond that stfu about the direction it is going.
My issue is this: kia2 is a hotbed of based discussion and if he keeps stomping the community's free speech people will just abandon this place completely and he can hang out with Imp1, gizortnik, and himself. I dont want to see that happen to this place.
My advice to Dom: clean up pedo shit/illegal shit/porn spam and leave the discussion to the users. You are a moderator, not a King. We are a text board community, not your acolytes.
-Happy
We had the same thing happen on OmegaCanada as well.
There were several threads of this nature made by various members, expressing displeasure with the mod (Ham).
It played out differently there though, rather than become disengaged, our mod Ham became even more ban heavy, which prompted our departure.
The community here have the right idea, multiple mods covering many time zones would be ideal.
It would also minimize the workload on any individual mod, for the sake of keeping an eye out for the pedo troll.
Another benefit is it creates room for the natural flow of people, i.e., some mods becoming less engaging then re-engaging, such that the coverage continues.
A potential drawback is if the mods diverge strongly on 'how things ought to be' then new issues could arise, and the more mods you have the more likely this is.
As for people complaining, being a mod for a while thickens your skin to this, and you learn what's a waste of time and what isn't with regards to modding.
I think specific to KIA2, a more difficult challenge for any new mod could turn out to be balancing the community's desires and Dom's desires.
Ah, I see. I wasn't familiar with the case on omega Canada.
Ultimately, if Dom wants to go hardcore on us, which he unilaterally can, there's nothing we can do. In that case, I will migrate elsewhere, as will most users, and he will lose his kingdom anyway.
The most important thing is the community thrives. Mods trying to run things per their own ideas will always divide userbases and ultimately fail.
I've come to the opinion that this is more tricky than it sounds on paper.
I'm not sure there's a clearly right answer to how modding ought to be for the sake of allowing a "right-wing" community to thrive.
There are however clearly many ways to mod incorrectly
Very difficult to figure out how to mod it's true. I prefer a pretty pared down rule set but that requires a strong community to police itself.
This is what we opted for on FCW
That's probably a key component for this mod policy.
Further to that, a steady but relatively slow stream of new membership to integrate into the community is an important aspect.
Otherwise the community will slowly degrade as members leave for a variety of reasons (e.g., tired of politics, heated disagreements with others in the community, other aspects of life popping up, etc.).
If the active membership declines, one consequence is it runs the risk of the self-policing becoming more and more relaxed. Which in itself creates a negative feedback.