notice that I actually answered the question before pointing out the diversionary debate tactic. You just keep repeating the "no you!" bullshit.
As for "gish gallop", he was referencing a completely different conversation, misrepresenting my position in that conversation, and using that strawman to attack my character. I simply addressed that dishonest tactic.
and finally, notice how there was never a refutation of my "ringleader" argument. Just ad hominem whataboutism.
Collectivism isn't bad. If the leader represents you it can be a great thing.
I've never known a collectivist leader to be legit. at the macro scale, they tend to lead their people to starvation. at the micro scale, they're almost always feds.
Individualist ideologies like libertarianism make people easier to conquer.
Only if the people don't pay attention, and that is not a problem exclusive to libertarianism. whether or not a people can be conquered is dependent on the people's strength of will, sense of community, and vigilance. identifying and casting out bad actors is crucial. if you use skin color for this filter, you will cast out innocents and overlook the spies and saboteurs.
if you race mix, you split your loyalties
sorry, but I don't feel like aligning with white college liberals or white trailer trash junkies. other than the fact that we vaguely look alike, we have nothing in common.
I would much rather align with people who want the country to be free, secure, and stable, and are of sound moral character. Whether they're white, asian, hispanic, or even black, it makes no difference to me.
No group will trust you or your kids
correction: no racist group will trust me or my kids. thankfully, my community is not racist and we are very stable.
notice that I actually answered the question before pointing out the diversionary debate tactic. You just keep repeating the "no you!" bullshit.
As for "gish gallop", he was referencing a completely different conversation, misrepresenting my position in that conversation, and using that strawman to attack my character. I simply addressed that dishonest tactic.
and finally, notice how there was never a refutation of my "ringleader" argument. Just ad hominem whataboutism.
I've never known a collectivist leader to be legit. at the macro scale, they tend to lead their people to starvation. at the micro scale, they're almost always feds.
Only if the people don't pay attention, and that is not a problem exclusive to libertarianism. whether or not a people can be conquered is dependent on the people's strength of will, sense of community, and vigilance. identifying and casting out bad actors is crucial. if you use skin color for this filter, you will cast out innocents and overlook the spies and saboteurs.
sorry, but I don't feel like aligning with white college liberals or white trailer trash junkies. other than the fact that we vaguely look alike, we have nothing in common.
I would much rather align with people who want the country to be free, secure, and stable, and are of sound moral character. Whether they're white, asian, hispanic, or even black, it makes no difference to me.
correction: no racist group will trust me or my kids. thankfully, my community is not racist and we are very stable.