whataboutism is a tactic to divert away from the central talking point. in this case, it is an attack on the character instead of the argument. this is usually made when you have no argument.
notice that I actually answered the question before pointing out the diversionary debate tactic. You just keep repeating the "no you!" bullshit.
As for "gish gallop", he was referencing a completely different conversation, misrepresenting my position in that conversation, and using that strawman to attack my character. I simply addressed that dishonest tactic.
and finally, notice how there was never a refutation of my "ringleader" argument. Just ad hominem whataboutism.
whataboutism is a tactic to divert away from the central talking point. in this case, it is an attack on the character instead of the argument. this is usually made when you have no argument.
notice that I actually answered the question before pointing out the diversionary debate tactic. You just keep repeating the "no you!" bullshit.
As for "gish gallop", he was referencing a completely different conversation, misrepresenting my position in that conversation, and using that strawman to attack my character. I simply addressed that dishonest tactic.
and finally, notice how there was never a refutation of my "ringleader" argument. Just ad hominem whataboutism.