Accusing others of we whataboutism is a leftist tactic. Because they only try to hold non leftists to their own standards. They don't care about violating their own standards.
whataboutism is a tactic to divert away from the central talking point. in this case, it is an attack on the character instead of the argument. this is usually made when you have no argument.
notice that I actually answered the question before pointing out the diversionary debate tactic. You just keep repeating the "no you!" bullshit.
As for "gish gallop", he was referencing a completely different conversation, misrepresenting my position in that conversation, and using that strawman to attack my character. I simply addressed that dishonest tactic.
and finally, notice how there was never a refutation of my "ringleader" argument. Just ad hominem whataboutism.
This but unironically. """collectivism""' just means you serve a ringleader, whether he makes himself known or not.
Collectivism isn't bad. If the leader represents you it can be a great thing. Collectivism to often is used to direct useful idiots like communism but it doesn't have to be about misleading the masses to serve a few elites. Individualist ideologies like libertarianism make people easier to conquer.
If you race mix, you split your loyalties. No group will trust you or your kids. Your kids can only succeed in an individualistic society, except this comic paints why that is doomed.
Accusing others of we whataboutism is a leftist tactic. Because they only try to hold non leftists to their own standards. They don't care about violating their own standards.
whataboutism is a tactic to divert away from the central talking point. in this case, it is an attack on the character instead of the argument. this is usually made when you have no argument.
No, idiot leftists throw out their gish gallop to hide their own failings and throw around accusations of whataboutism when they get called out on it.
Just another form of projection.
notice that I actually answered the question before pointing out the diversionary debate tactic. You just keep repeating the "no you!" bullshit.
As for "gish gallop", he was referencing a completely different conversation, misrepresenting my position in that conversation, and using that strawman to attack my character. I simply addressed that dishonest tactic.
and finally, notice how there was never a refutation of my "ringleader" argument. Just ad hominem whataboutism.
Collectivism isn't bad. If the leader represents you it can be a great thing. Collectivism to often is used to direct useful idiots like communism but it doesn't have to be about misleading the masses to serve a few elites. Individualist ideologies like libertarianism make people easier to conquer.
If you race mix, you split your loyalties. No group will trust you or your kids. Your kids can only succeed in an individualistic society, except this comic paints why that is doomed.