make up argument, put it in your opponent's mouth, argue against that made up argument
I got news for you: that's called straw-manning.
examples from your rant:
you only seem to become concerned about "the children" when they or their families object to your own agenda: LGBTQ+ kids, kids with different political views, kids who reject your own political views, etc. You go absolutely wild for those kids, yet ignore every other child out there and their suffering.
your opponent never mentioned "the children", """alphabet""" kids, or anything of the like. This was purely your own fabrication.
Sometimes you even PRAISE child brides, teenagers literally sold by their families to adult men like property
citation heavily needed. your opponent never mentions this, you just made it up.
Do you care? Do you make posts mourning the children and sending prayers to their families? NO! You outright tell the victims of school shootings that their children's murders were hoaxes and then harass grieving families. Child soldiers? Children in poverty? Homeless children? Disabled children? You. Don't. Care.
so you ask a whole bunch of questions, then answer them for your opponent and attack the answers you yourself gave him. it doesn't get more straw-manning than that.
On a side note, making social media posts about a tragedy is about as pathetic as calling it a hoax. all it does is sensationalize the events and help spread misinformation.
It's clear you have a statement to make. in order to actually reach people, you need to understand their position. Straw-manning is counterproductive to this goal.
The way you said "alphabet kids" with quotations marks actually proves my point that you don't actually care for children: you care for your political agenda in the body of a child to portray your goals as innocent and precious.
Neither will you if you keep going "strawman" to every piece of criticism. I can just see you at a job...
"You gave them the wrong order of food!"
"Strawman!"
"You're fired!"
"I'm fired? This is all the fault of the gays because I have to find strawmen to blame for my own bad choices!"
No, you're ignoring criticism because you can't handle being wrong.
I got news for you: that's called straw-manning.
examples from your rant:
your opponent never mentioned "the children", """alphabet""" kids, or anything of the like. This was purely your own fabrication.
citation heavily needed. your opponent never mentions this, you just made it up.
so you ask a whole bunch of questions, then answer them for your opponent and attack the answers you yourself gave him. it doesn't get more straw-manning than that.
On a side note, making social media posts about a tragedy is about as pathetic as calling it a hoax. all it does is sensationalize the events and help spread misinformation.
It's clear you have a statement to make. in order to actually reach people, you need to understand their position. Straw-manning is counterproductive to this goal.
The way you said "alphabet kids" with quotations marks actually proves my point that you don't actually care for children: you care for your political agenda in the body of a child to portray your goals as innocent and precious.
another strawman. you will never learn
Neither will you if you keep going "strawman" to every piece of criticism. I can just see you at a job...
"You gave them the wrong order of food!" "Strawman!" "You're fired!" "I'm fired? This is all the fault of the gays because I have to find strawmen to blame for my own bad choices!"