Thanks for proving one of my theories to be right: you weren't sexually abused as you claim.
If you were, you would be obsessed with hunting down those who did wrong to you instead of trying to cover up actual abuse of children. And when you try to memory-hole and shame those who direct their hatred upon at child abusers, it marks you as a child abuser yourself.
You've proven yourself to be part of the pedos that spammed this forum with disgusting pro-child abuse drivel. No matter how hard you deny it, your own actions are the proof that you are in with the pedo pajeet spammer(s). Those are not my feelings; those are your words.
By the way, did you know that the pedo pajeets also tried that 'waaah no uuu!' defense too? That's how I know you're one and the same, subhuman filth.
I provided the proof of you calling the case of Nadia Murad's censorship 'whataboutism', and now you're reduced to calling yourself a liar? Ha, now that's funny.
Hm, I recall that you pajeets tried some other word to hide behind. Hebesomething. Me, I don't care for you pedos trying to argue semantics. You enable child abusers, you are my prey.
I'm a celibate virgin and you probably complain about video game characters not being sexy enough.
Ha, you're a virgin because even kids in your shithole countries know to avoid you, you disgusting rapist.
Secondly, the pedo pajeets were obsessed with their fantasies, and in their desperation, intended to inflict marriage rape on their victims. You bitching about 'sexy video game characters' clearly proves that you really don't care about real life victims of sexual abuse - rather, you'd attack people who dare speak out against it by whining about "sexy videogame characters". And that crack in your persona alone shatters the veneer of the "french-canadian woman who suffered sexual abuse" persona, you filthy kidfucker.
You're twice more likely to hurt a kid than me.
Unlike me, your kind have never been good at seperating fiction from reality. Thats what convinced your kind to force children into marriage and abusive relationships.
Funny, you keep calling me a pedophile but that doesn't make it true.
Your words and behavior indicted you as a pedo pajeet, not mine.
Do you know the more you use that word meaninglessly Also, you're a hypocrite because you just were calling me a rapist AND a virgin in the same sentence. Rapists can't be virgins, that's literally impossible.
Not meaningless - you are an enabler of child abuse, hiding behind your fanfiction of being a victim.
Not a hypocrite either because I don't consider rapists to have any connection borne out of love for their victims. No matter how much you rape children in your hunger for power over others, you'll always be a loveless virgin that needs to put down others to feel better about yourself.
You're clearly not a rational or reasonable human being. Not taking you seriously anymore, though I never did.
Good to see some honesty from you for once, subhuman filth. Maybe do that instead of gobbling down taxpayer money to harass people for the 'crime' of getting angry at state-sponsored child abuse.
Thanks for proving one of my theories to be right: you weren't sexually abused as you claim.
If you were, you would be obsessed with hunting down those who did wrong to you instead of trying to cover up actual abuse of children. And when you try to memory-hole and shame those who direct their hatred upon at child abusers, it marks you as a child abuser yourself.
You've proven yourself to be part of the pedos that spammed this forum with disgusting pro-child abuse drivel. No matter how hard you deny it, your own actions are the proof that you are in with the pedo pajeet spammer(s). Those are not my feelings; those are your words.
By the way, did you know that the pedo pajeets also tried that 'waaah no uuu!' defense too? That's how I know you're one and the same, subhuman filth.
You called the case of Nadia Murad's censorship 'whataboutism', subhuman.
https://archive.is/ovRn0
You're the sexual abuser here.
I provided the proof of you calling the case of Nadia Murad's censorship 'whataboutism', and now you're reduced to calling yourself a liar? Ha, now that's funny.
Scream more for me, pedophile filth.
Hm, I recall that you pajeets tried some other word to hide behind. Hebesomething. Me, I don't care for you pedos trying to argue semantics. You enable child abusers, you are my prey.
Ha, you're a virgin because even kids in your shithole countries know to avoid you, you disgusting rapist.
Secondly, the pedo pajeets were obsessed with their fantasies, and in their desperation, intended to inflict marriage rape on their victims. You bitching about 'sexy video game characters' clearly proves that you really don't care about real life victims of sexual abuse - rather, you'd attack people who dare speak out against it by whining about "sexy videogame characters". And that crack in your persona alone shatters the veneer of the "french-canadian woman who suffered sexual abuse" persona, you filthy kidfucker.
Unlike me, your kind have never been good at seperating fiction from reality. Thats what convinced your kind to force children into marriage and abusive relationships.
https://web.archive.org/web/20240713010614/https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/17te9oCjQO/x/c/4ZCbCqI8bJg
That is what you are, pedo.
I'll skin that set of arguments too. Watch.
Your words and behavior indicted you as a pedo pajeet, not mine.
Not meaningless - you are an enabler of child abuse, hiding behind your fanfiction of being a victim.
Not a hypocrite either because I don't consider rapists to have any connection borne out of love for their victims. No matter how much you rape children in your hunger for power over others, you'll always be a loveless virgin that needs to put down others to feel better about yourself.
Good to see some honesty from you for once, subhuman filth. Maybe do that instead of gobbling down taxpayer money to harass people for the 'crime' of getting angry at state-sponsored child abuse.