Not surprising, let's be honest the Japanese during WW2 probably didn't have the best reputation (cough Unit 731, Rape of Nanjing, treatment of Allied POWs) that would lead to them wanting to have these former psychopaths have guns again.
Which ironically led to them getting rid of their entire military, replacing it with a self defence force and having to have the US stationed there permanently which built up resentment thanks to some of the actions of soldiers stationed there.
I think they did the same to Germans too if memory serves right, only thanks to the Berlin Airlift happening so quickly after, it made them backtrack quickly to Germany NEEDS a military again.
You know that the Allied powers were disarming not just the Japanese military but the Japanese CIVILIANS right? i thought you would understand that the civilians are not the military nor the government. The whole argument over civilians having the right to have guns is so that they can fight the government is it not? and yet the Allied powers obviously didnt believe in that as they disarmed the Japanese civilians
You only need to look up the Battle of Okinawa to see why they wouldn't trust CIVILIANS with weapons either.
They had the same issue in Germany too that led to the 'werwolf' paranoia for a while not to mention there were still a few legitimate traps placed for allied soldiers by resentful Germans after WW2.
It was stupid not to repeal it all later though when it was confirmed they wouldn't want to murder you all when they got their guns and swords back as that stifled having more home grown experience with weapons.
Not surprising, let's be honest the Japanese during WW2 probably didn't have the best reputation (cough Unit 731, Rape of Nanjing, treatment of Allied POWs) that would lead to them wanting to have these former psychopaths have guns again.
Which ironically led to them getting rid of their entire military, replacing it with a self defence force and having to have the US stationed there permanently which built up resentment thanks to some of the actions of soldiers stationed there.
I think they did the same to Germans too if memory serves right, only thanks to the Berlin Airlift happening so quickly after, it made them backtrack quickly to Germany NEEDS a military again.
You know that the Allied powers were disarming not just the Japanese military but the Japanese CIVILIANS right? i thought you would understand that the civilians are not the military nor the government. The whole argument over civilians having the right to have guns is so that they can fight the government is it not? and yet the Allied powers obviously didnt believe in that as they disarmed the Japanese civilians
Yes that's what I was inferring
You only need to look up the Battle of Okinawa to see why they wouldn't trust CIVILIANS with weapons either.
They had the same issue in Germany too that led to the 'werwolf' paranoia for a while not to mention there were still a few legitimate traps placed for allied soldiers by resentful Germans after WW2.
It was stupid not to repeal it all later though when it was confirmed they wouldn't want to murder you all when they got their guns and swords back as that stifled having more home grown experience with weapons.
The Allied powers claim "we're freeing them from authoritarian rule" and "we're fighting for freedom" whilst banning the civilians from having guns .