This might be a hot take, I'm curious to know how others feel about it.
I think there is a big difference between a work of fiction, marketed as fiction, that attempts to be historically accurate to the setting, and historical facts,
vs
A work of fake non-fiction, that lies about history, tells a story that pretends to be true, but then hides behind 'its just fiction, chill out' to deal with critisisms.
This might be a hot take, I'm curious to know how others feel about it.
I think there is a big difference between a work of fiction, marketed as fiction, that attempts to be historically accurate to the setting, and historical facts,
vs
A work of fake non-fiction, that lies about history, tells a story that pretends to be true, but then hides behind 'its just fiction, chill out' to deal with critisisms.
Ubisoft is being retarded and hates Japan.