I don't know maybe I'm wrong about this but they seem to want young men to take ED pills. And this seems off to me, shouldn't young people be able to achieve erections without medicinal aid? Are men not getting erections at younger ages?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (20)
sorted by:
The amount of gaslighting about the negative effects that soy has on testosterone is astounding. They also lie about the benefits that meat (especially red meat) has on testosterone levels.
There's also a lot of other variables that tend to fly under the radar too. While testosterone is certainly one major benefit of regular exercise and physical activity, improved blood flow, enhancing the cardiovascular systems (especially with regards to oxygen in-take), etc etc all improve just about... everything. For both men and women.
But then the left has thoroughly taken the narrative of discouraging physical fitness and activity to the point of outright gaslighting and lying.
It's been a sponser for a bunch of podcast for years. I've recently started seeing commercials for it and similar products. But the ads are filled wirh young women and young men. I remember when viagra was new their spokespeople were older dudes like Bob Dole.
Going generic does make it a lot more affordable to a lot more consumers, so maybe that's part of the reason they're broadening their target market.
Could also be a tweak to the advertising campaign, not specifically to target younger consumers so much as to give the impression that the drug will make middle aged guys (feel) "younger" and appeal more to young hot women.
It's not exactly a new kind of advertising strategy either. Cigarette and alcohol ads in magazines used to do similar things.