Legal Bros: does this seem like a proper use of "standing", or is it bullshit?
(www.zerohedge.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (21)
sorted by:
not a lawyer, but this is just bullshit
if our states don't have "standing" to stand up to the federal government shitting all over our constitutional rights, who fn does?
fuck this country
Nah, fuck the people we've allowed to ruin it. The framework is still great, we just have a bunch of traitors ignoring and subverting as they please.
They do have standing, our justice system is simply on the very long list of traitorous and/or cowardly assholes.
The framework allows traitors to ignore and subvert it, so it's hardly perfect. Good thing article V details how to change or replace it, so barriers to subversion can be added if we ever manage to take our nation back before it burns to the ground.
The founders knew that snakes would figure out how to subvert it, there's no such thing as an uncorruptable system.
The enormous power of the feds is why the Battle of Athens can't happen today. We're supposed to have the 2A as the eject lever in case all else fails, but the corrupt snakes destroying everything have the world's best military, intel agencies, and militarized police protecting them from their own constituents.
Turns out once gov officials are no longer afraid of ending up in a ditch or swinging from a tree they wipe their ass with the Constitution.