wikipedia also includes SPLC on its "list of reliable sources", even though SPLC has paid out millions for defamation (meaning they lied), and have repeatedly argued in court that their statements are opinions rather than assertions of fact. the fact that SPLC admits its statements are opinions and not facts means they're not eligible for inclusion on wikipedia.
wikipedia also includes SPLC on its "list of reliable sources", even though SPLC has paid out millions for defamation (meaning they lied), and have repeatedly argued in court that their statements are opinions rather than assertions of fact. the fact that SPLC admits its statements are opinions and not facts means they're not eligible for inclusion on wikipedia.
but here we are anyways.
The SPLC staff know they're a-holes. It's all about power.