To a figurehead of a community well known for raping and pillaging white Europe is somehow offensive to an African American woman who claims to be an educator.
And the solution is to put up some descendants of Genghis Khan and other marauders from other dominant tribes across the globe to appease her.
Is she a rape apologist or does she not allow for the celebration of Nordic identity?
To a figurehead of a community well known for raping and pillaging white Europe is somehow offensive to an African American woman who claims to be an educator.
And the solution is to put up some descendants of Genghis Khan and other marauders from other dominant tribes across the globe to appease her.
Is she a rape apologist or does she not allow for the celebration of Nordic identity?
Why not both?