38.85% of the incel participants were right-leaning, 44.70% were left-leaning, and 17.47% were centrist.
I find it funny how the left is the biggest political group among incels, yet they are the ones that use the word as an insult the most. Really makes you think.
The lefties have been shown time and again not to have any understanding of any other groups. Any time they come up with something to accuse others of, they've dug it out of experience with their own movement and projected it outwards
The more interesting stat is that centrists apparently fuck. Presumably because women just love a man who knows how to speak out of both sides of his mouth.
You're assuming the (male) population groups itself roughly evenly into those three camps, when absent outside information it's just as reasonable to assume that the population splits itself up closer to the distribution seen in the study.
It's unreasonable to assume it is exactly equally split yes. But in a culture as highly politically charged as the present day US it isn't unreasonable to assume that political affiliation affects your social prospects and the differences aren't purely population effects.
It's open to whatever they decided to use to determine the affiliations when that stat was determined, because social "sciences" are bullshit with no real standards. But at least for data I've seen that uses registered rep, dem, or none/independent as a proxy (not ideal, but at least it's objective), men under 30 are pretty consistently >30% none/ind.
I find it funny how the left is the biggest political group among incels, yet they are the ones that use the word as an insult the most. Really makes you think.
The lefties have been shown time and again not to have any understanding of any other groups. Any time they come up with something to accuse others of, they've dug it out of experience with their own movement and projected it outwards
The more interesting stat is that centrists apparently fuck. Presumably because women just love a man who knows how to speak out of both sides of his mouth.
You're assuming the (male) population groups itself roughly evenly into those three camps, when absent outside information it's just as reasonable to assume that the population splits itself up closer to the distribution seen in the study.
It's unreasonable to assume it is exactly equally split yes. But in a culture as highly politically charged as the present day US it isn't unreasonable to assume that political affiliation affects your social prospects and the differences aren't purely population effects.
It's open to whatever they decided to use to determine the affiliations when that stat was determined, because social "sciences" are bullshit with no real standards. But at least for data I've seen that uses registered rep, dem, or none/independent as a proxy (not ideal, but at least it's objective), men under 30 are pretty consistently >30% none/ind.