The topic of Jews has always been on the fringes of the internet (this board among them), and dismissed wholesale by just about anyone outside of said circles. That is how things worked for the longest time, basically since the birth of the internet as a whole. That changed, very noticeably, very abruptly, and very obviously, after Israel's counter-invasion of Palestine in the aftermath of the October 7th, 2023 attacks by Hamas.
Since then, something has shifted in the wider internet (and maybe wider society, but that could just be wishful thinking), and I can't place my finger on how or why this has happened. Has it been building up over time? Did it blow up all at once? What other factors are involved? I don't know.
Here are a couple recent examples to see what I mean;
-
Mark Dice, say what you want about him, is someone I've kept an eye off and on for many years. I would usually place him closer to milquetoast than not (not as bad as, say, Tim Pool the Dim Fool, but just enough to want to keep his channel). However, he went full blown Noticing(TM) in his most recent video, to my complete surprise. He even admits at the end of the video that he thinks he's "flying too close to the sun" (because YouTube), so it's safe to say that he knows.
-
Info Wars (and by extension, Alex Jones) has always been willing to broach into many a subject, but has always been rather mum on this particular topic, minus low hanging fruit such as the USS Liberty (the possible reasons why are for another discussion). That is, until a few days ago, when a video + article was put out on Zionism, a pro-Jewish ideology. For all I know, its contents could be total BS, but the fact they address it at all is to be noted.
Of course, we are now seeing the US Government revealing their true loyalties once and for all (i.e. not to the American people, but to the nation state of Israel) in response to these shifts in discussion surrounding <pulls out a gallon of Minute Maid> the juice, and it is currently attempting to make "antisemitism" a federal crime based on an extremely broad definition, that can best be summarized as "rules, ethics, and accountability are for goyim".
Let me know your thoughts.
I'm not either but I won't countersignal them either. My conclusion is that ethnic (and religious) homogeneity, legally enforced by putting the interests one ethnicity and religion first above other considerations, is the correct way to produce the greatest good. Within that sphere there can be disagreements and dissent as long as the primary concern is always the good of the (specific) people. The economic system implemented inside of that framework is of a much lower importance.
Right now that is impossible because of globalists, many of whom are jewish, are actively working to erase both national sovereignty AND ethnic uniqueness except for jews and except for Israel.
Therefore the only path forward toward ethnic nationalism is to remove the globalist jewish influence from western governments. Once that is done the laws can be changed to remove their cultural and economic influence.
The thing is that wouldn't be necessary if we had actually unbiased enforcement of the laws already on the books. But that postmodern/marxist "thought" that everyone who graduated from the "important" schools was steeped in is that there can be no such thing as neutrality, and every action either forwards the revolution or acts against it.
Maybe you need to understand what the Austrian painter was even about. Maybe read what he said before forming opinions about what he believed.