The link has been deleted in the screenshot so as not to give clicks to this oddball. https://i.imgur.com/j6vF3Gd.png
This is what he declared "This is the thing right, and I'm not at all coming at you specifically, but clearly, the game is reviewing well. I wanted to ensure in my review to dock significant points for the objectifying BS specifically because I knew the industry at large, even if they do mention it as a negative element in their review, would still let it slip by with 8/10's. What lessons do we expect developers to learn if they're not held to account for this stuff? How else do we hold them to account beyond not buying the game I suppose." https://i.imgur.com/WMLwLOP.png
He is overestemating his importance. Metacritic has completely ignored his review.
Games Urinalists forced developers to kneel by exploiting the fact that many publishing houses tied income to Metacritic score. So the press then could bully them and threaten to tank the ratings, costing the people who actually work for a living big bucks.