The link has been deleted in the screenshot so as not to give clicks to this oddball. https://i.imgur.com/j6vF3Gd.png
This is what he declared "This is the thing right, and I'm not at all coming at you specifically, but clearly, the game is reviewing well. I wanted to ensure in my review to dock significant points for the objectifying BS specifically because I knew the industry at large, even if they do mention it as a negative element in their review, would still let it slip by with 8/10's. What lessons do we expect developers to learn if they're not held to account for this stuff? How else do we hold them to account beyond not buying the game I suppose." https://i.imgur.com/WMLwLOP.png
He is overestemating his importance. Metacritic has completely ignored his review.
For future reference, you can archive sites for this purpose (and in case they change something later) at archive.today or archive.org. Dot org is not as reliable to keep your archive up, but it seems a few people have problems accessing pages made by dot today due to a bug with captchas.
Thanks https://archive.ph/66BSw