Me thinking that is the rough idea as a general response to someone trying to consider a philosophical approach to interpreting the bible does not mean that's how I think in any way.
And so I cannot reply, in good faith, as to how I am different from any religion because I have not stated my position on anything as absolute as knowing.
Had I an interpretation of the bible I would be sure to keep it to myself because, as you have stated, trying to explain would bring up lots of criticism and I don't want to upset people on a subject that is beyond reasoning.
The bible is one of many religious texts and I apply the same methodology to them all as I do not wish to upset people on a subject that is beyond reasoning.
Had I divine knowledge I would surely keep that to myself for the same reasons.
Me thinking that is the rough idea as a general response to someone trying to consider a philosophical approach to interpreting the bible does not mean that's how I think in any way.
And so I cannot reply, in good faith, as to how I am different from any religion because I have not stated my position on anything as absolute as knowing.
Had I an interpretation of the bible I would be sure to keep it to myself because, as you have stated, trying to explain would bring up lots of criticism and I don't want to upset people on a subject that is beyond reasoning.
The bible is one of many religious texts and I apply the same methodology to them all as I do not wish to upset people on a subject that is beyond reasoning.
Had I divine knowledge I would surely keep that to myself for the same reasons.
It's all fun to think about until you share it with another Bluestorm, then there are only wars.
There will be wars anyway and so why taint the wonders of existence with spilled blood?