To completely sidestep gender identity laws, why not have bathroom facilities based upon dick or no dick?
Have a dick? You must use this room to piss or change.
Do not have a dick? You must use this room to piss or change.
100% just boil it down to cock or no cock. I expect having it based upon anatomical reality of one specific organ can't be construed as denying gender identity. It's just cut and dry anatomy standards.
1st off, stop trying to out-logic illogical retards.
2nd, they will literally cut their dicks off to enter women's spaces. This is not a winning strategy.
If they're willing to cut off their dick, and follow through, I see it as a 99% likely harm reduction. The "fakers" will be blocked from doing harm outright this way.
I wouldn't say it's 99% safe.
Sure, no penetrative rape. But ones willing to go that far are still unstable, violent, fetishist weirdos with stronger bone structure, longer reach and more muscle power.
Without testicles, the muscle power is going to decline. They'll have mechanical advantages, sure, but people like Jessica Yaniv would never give up the tiny little dick to jerk off with after asking a beautician to wax the balls.
That is why I think making the dick the deciding factor will be the most clutch method of dealing with this AND sidestepping gender identity protection laws. I mean, damn, call it a feminine penis all you want but if you want to whip it out to piss you're gonna do it in the penis room.