Pretend you have one hour to convince a random normie that the mainstream media is propaganda rather than a collection of well-meaning, objective journalists who sometimes get it wrong but overall try to deliver fair and accurate reporting.
If you fail, you die.
What's your approach?
It's a stupid hypothetical for several reasons but I'm very interested in this topic and I'm curious to hear your thoughts, so I'll ask for a pass on the overly dramatic scenario.
I'm guessing the most common response will be, "It won't work no matter what you do", and fwiw I think that's correct. But for the small group who can be reasoned with, what do you think is the optimal approach?
Convincing anyone of anything is rather hard... but for me i try to show them the evidence, guage their reaction, and see what dumbass counter points thay have. usually they help me see fault in my own arguments. other times their rebuttals are just dumbass and reactionary. however in your example you brought up no less than 3 times not to bring up race only to talk about race. namely spot the white person. you do know leading with ads not having enough white people in it. and using the past to show how there were more white people... might actually harm your cause right? fuck man i'm not even white and even i know that's a bad idea. what worked for you! may not work for others.