Pretend you have one hour to convince a random normie that the mainstream media is propaganda rather than a collection of well-meaning, objective journalists who sometimes get it wrong but overall try to deliver fair and accurate reporting.
If you fail, you die.
What's your approach?
It's a stupid hypothetical for several reasons but I'm very interested in this topic and I'm curious to hear your thoughts, so I'll ask for a pass on the overly dramatic scenario.
I'm guessing the most common response will be, "It won't work no matter what you do", and fwiw I think that's correct. But for the small group who can be reasoned with, what do you think is the optimal approach?
Shit man, going by our conversations you wouldn't be able to convince a fish to evolve to a land mammal, let alone convince anyone of shit, in baby steps. sure your post is well meaning, and not dumb. but like with so many commenters here... what's the replacement? are you teaching normies to trust the news 10% of the time? some of the time? or take everything with a grain of salt? all i'm hearing, is news is bad... and that's it. no critical thinking outside of news bad. and follow my sources, which isn't completely biased i swear. try understanding that, you EU faggot.