Pretend you have one hour to convince a random normie that the mainstream media is propaganda rather than a collection of well-meaning, objective journalists who sometimes get it wrong but overall try to deliver fair and accurate reporting.
If you fail, you die.
What's your approach?
It's a stupid hypothetical for several reasons but I'm very interested in this topic and I'm curious to hear your thoughts, so I'll ask for a pass on the overly dramatic scenario.
I'm guessing the most common response will be, "It won't work no matter what you do", and fwiw I think that's correct. But for the small group who can be reasoned with, what do you think is the optimal approach?
Good. however... this form of thinking can apply to anyone. by which i mean your model. for instance. what if you had a view a negative on gay people. i then showed you some decent evidence bla bla bla, you compared models, and found gay people are completely normal, or whatever your stance is on any given subject... my point being is. rather you get your information from the news, or some right wing dude off of youtube... check their facts! yeah the news can lie, and so can your sources. so it's always important that you look behind your own sources, and people. to not get bamboozled. least you're just the controlled opposition.