Pretend you have one hour to convince a random normie that the mainstream media is propaganda rather than a collection of well-meaning, objective journalists who sometimes get it wrong but overall try to deliver fair and accurate reporting.
If you fail, you die.
What's your approach?
It's a stupid hypothetical for several reasons but I'm very interested in this topic and I'm curious to hear your thoughts, so I'll ask for a pass on the overly dramatic scenario.
I'm guessing the most common response will be, "It won't work no matter what you do", and fwiw I think that's correct. But for the small group who can be reasoned with, what do you think is the optimal approach?
Start with Epstein and the ridiculous nature of his 'suicide'. Then that the MSM somehow pretended the story or his John's didn't exist, when it should be the juiciest ratings bait ever.
Then weave in his ties to Mossad, and their known mode of operations. AKA leverage, kompromat, extortion. Jizz's dad was a rich, Israeli spy.
Start piling on who funds MSM. 75% pharma, 25% MIC. Three sacred cows on social media. Safe & effective, endless war, and ignore the tiny hat cabal.
Or bring up JFK.
Most normies are more convinced that his death was a conspiracy than I am (though most people here would call me a normie, or a Bolshevik or whatever).