I mean aggressively neutral, not on the "right" side or the "wrong" side, just completely neutral.
seeing as I wasn't involved at the time, i'd be nice to see someone try to do a port mortem.
I mean aggressively neutral, not on the "right" side or the "wrong" side, just completely neutral.
seeing as I wasn't involved at the time, i'd be nice to see someone try to do a port mortem.
The facts point to only one conclusion though if you actually believe in truth. Pretending to be neutral just feels pointless to me.
People who can't be assed to make a decision or take a side when the facts are right in front of them, eh... just feels like a lame move all things considered. It also doesn't help that so much of GG content was censored online either. Even so-called """neutrals""" were being attacked during the GG days despite, ironically, most of them favoring the leftists.
And generally I've seen the idea of neutrality approached from that fenceshitter (who's actually a leftist) perspective online.
There are no judges on the internet, no courts of law, no actual trustworthy entity who is truly and utterly reliable. You're basically asking for a Fredrik Knudsen type of video, but even his videos aren't perfect and often miss a lot of facts.
GG was a massive event. Its impossible to have a truly comprehensive coverage of it imo, you'd have to focus on major events and people and even then you can only do so much, to ask for the person to be neutral on top of it just feels like a bit much, and I could probably find a lot to criticize about the person that does attempt to be neutral, because I feel like being neutral about GG would be giving our enemies far too much credit.
Yeah, it’s one thing to digest and read all of the information provided to you, but most of us are even here in the first place because we all came to the general correct conclusion that one side is objectively correct and the other lied and manipulated in order to be a wolf in sheep’s clothing